Can a pattern of repeated non-conformities point to a deeper leadership issue?
In recent audit cycles, global data has shown that many companies continue to receive the same findings across internal, second-party, and third-party audits. These are not technical oversights or gaps in knowledge. They are signals that internal ownership of food safety responsibilities may be lacking.
Audit data from 2025 highlights one common theme: repeated findings often stem from unresolved root causes, poor communication across teams, and minimal follow-up after initial non-conformities are flagged.
What the Data Shows
???? Inconsistent Corrective Action Closure
Findings marked “closed” without documented evidence or validation steps continue to resurface.
???? Unclear Responsibility Structures
Without clear accountability, even well-written CAPAs fail to be implemented fully.
???? No Performance Feedback Loops
Companies struggle to integrate audit outcomes into continuous improvement cycles or leadership reviews.
Audit-Based Reflections on Organisational Readiness
Audits are not just a test of food safety systems they reflect the organisation’s ability to respond, adapt, and lead.
✅ Management Review Documentation
Evaluating whether audit results are discussed and acted upon at senior levels.
✅ Cross-Functional Ownership
Verifying how audit-related responsibilities are distributed beyond QA teams.
✅ Evidence of Follow-Up
Looking for proof of corrective action validation, training updates, and process changes.
✅ Audit History Analysis
Identifying patterns in findings that indicate systemic leadership gaps.
Certima’s Mission
As an impartial certification body, Certima assesses compliance with international food safety measures. While Certima does not provide operational guidance, audits serve as a valuable tool for businesses looking to evaluate their fraud prevention strategies and supply chain integrity.
Share Your Perspective: Have audit findings in your organisation been repeating themselves?
We invite you to share your perspective on how leadership drives audit culture.